|
|
Post by chrystalcole on Apr 16, 2020 11:48:04 GMT -8
I am a fidelity reviewer in Missouri and probably like most states we have decided to postpone fidelity reviews due to the COVID-19 crisis. With that said when this is over and we no longer have to practice social distancing or abiding by stay at home orders we will resume fidelity reviews. So we had tried to come up with what that may look like as we start doing these again. One thought was (which we had already been thinking about but no action taken) to do an abbreviated review for those ACT teams that score very high in fidelity. We were thinking about setting certain parameters on what would indicate that a team could have an abbreviated review and what that review would consist of. Some of our thoughts were that a team would need to have a 3.8 or higher overall score; fell into the high or exemplary range (3.8 or higher) in the last 2 reviews; no turnover in Core Team in previous 6 months; no more than 3 open positions at time of the review; and no vacancy in the program assistant at time of review. The abbreviated review would consist of receiving from the team a Team Survey, a client list/data sheet, and targeted questions for the team leader attached to the team survey. Has anyone done anything similar to this and what parameters did you use.
I would also be interested in hearing about this from Lorna or Maria as well. Is this something we could do and is there anything in the TMACT protocol that advises about this. I couldn't find anything. Thank you everyone for your input. |
|
|
|
Post by Chris Fournier on Apr 24, 2020 6:12:09 GMT -8
I am a fidelity reviewer in Missouri and probably like most states we have decided to postpone fidelity reviews due to the COVID-19 crisis. With that said when this is over and we no longer have to practice social distancing or abiding by stay at home orders we will resume fidelity reviews. So we had tried to come up with what that may look like as we start doing these again. One thought was (which we had already been thinking about but no action taken) to do an abbreviated review for those ACT teams that score very high in fidelity. We were thinking about setting certain parameters on what would indicate that a team could have an abbreviated review and what that review would consist of. Some of our thoughts were that a team would need to have a 3.8 or higher overall score; fell into the high or exemplary range (3.8 or higher) in the last 2 reviews; no turnover in Core Team in previous 6 months; no more than 3 open positions at time of the review; and no vacancy in the program assistant at time of review. The abbreviated review would consist of receiving from the team a Team Survey, a client list/data sheet, and targeted questions for the team leader attached to the team survey. Has anyone done anything similar to this and what parameters did you use.
I would also be interested in hearing about this from Lorna or Maria as well. Is this something we could do and is there anything in the TMACT protocol that advises about this. I couldn't find anything. Thank you everyone for your input.
Chrystal:
I believe Lorna and Maria have been discussing this very topic and are in the middle of putting together a work group to determine when should TMACT reviews begin post-pandemic and how should we interpret those findings.
Were you able to participate in the ACT Stakeholders meet up this past week (the Tuesday meet u)? I think that will be the place for these discussion to happen more.
|
|
